If You Revere the MSM, You Might Want to Reconsider

 https://www.theguardian.com/media/2025/jun/29/bbc-reckons-with-bias-accusations-over-israel-and-palestine-coverage

 https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-leaked-email-that-blows-apart-the-bbcs-impartiality-claims-over-gaza/

 https://www.foxnews.com/media/bbc-forced-correct-report-claiming-gazan-woman-died-from-malnutrition

 https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2024/11/2/over-100-staff-accuse-bbc-of-bias-in-its-coverage-of-israels-war-in-gaza

 https://www.aol.com/report-leaked-bbc-memo-orders-185742308.html

For some reason people have traditionally revered the BBC as a purveyor of "real journalism".  Yet for some reason those people have ignored that the BBC is essentially an arm of the British government.   What we've seen around the BBC coverage of the events in Gaza seems to (at a minimum) call their credibility as journalists into question.    I see no reason not to label their coverage, for the most part, as propaganda.  Especially in light of the recent leaked memo which tells "reporters" to cover the delivery of aid in so as to present a false picture of what is really happening.   As far as I'm concerned, the BBC is off of the "revered" list and is not practicing "real journalism".   They're simply a propaganda outlet for the left wing British government at this point.